TNT Express
35 Employer Review(s)
Colleagues:
Supervisor:
Tasks:
Salary:
Career:
OVERALL:
Location
#
Country
Date
Rating
Review
Burbach 1
11.10.2011
The Reviewer rates his job as follows: Recommendable workplace.
Erfurt 2
21.04.2015
The Reviewer rates his job as follows: Excellent employer.
Franfurt a.M. 3
20.10.2011
The Reviewer rates his job as follows: Sufficient cohesion. Lower wage level. Reasonable job provider.
Hamburg 4
21.04.2015
The Reviewer rates his job as follows: Excellent employer.
Hameln 5
04.07.2018
The Reviewer rates his job as follows: Employers with criticisms.
herbolzheim 6
07.11.2012
The Reviewer rates his job as follows: Pleasant cooperation. Problematic management style. Filling employment. Demotivating income. Rare upgrades. Reasonable job provider.
Hilden 7
07.03.2011
The Reviewer rates his job as follows: Lack of community spirit. Problematic management style. Rare upgrades. Not recommendable employer.
Hilden 8
22.08.2011
The Reviewer rates his job as follows: Functioning collegiality. Need to improve personnel management. Interesting tasks. Fair payments. Average recognition. Reasonable job provider.
Germany 9
11.10.2020
The Reviewer rates his job as follows: Excellent employer.
Germany 10
05.08.2012
The Reviewer rates his job as follows: Recommendable workplace.
Germany 11
13.02.2016
The Reviewer rates his job as follows: Excellent employer.
Germany 12
21.11.2018
The Reviewer rates his job as follows: Excellent employer.
Germany 13
01.10.2015
The Reviewer rates his job as follows: Excellent employer.
Germany 14
09.02.2016
The Reviewer rates his job as follows: Excellent employer.
Germany 15
09.06.2022
The Reviewer rates his job as follows: Excellent employer.
Kassel 16
27.02.2012
The Reviewer rates his job as follows: Satisfactory employment site.
Cologne 17
31.10.2016
The Reviewer rates his job as follows: Excellent employer.
Leipzig 18
19.10.2015
The Reviewer rates his job as follows: Excellent employer.
Leipzig 19
07.08.2012
The Reviewer rates his job as follows: Not recommendable employer.
Munich 20
08.02.2016
The Reviewer rates his job as follows: Excellent employer.
Munich 21
09.10.2011
The Reviewer rates his job as follows: Recommendable workplace.
Saarbrücken 22
24.12.2016
The Reviewer rates his job as follows: Reasonable job provider.
Stuttgart 23
14.08.2009
The Reviewer rates his job as follows: Lack of unity. Problematic management style. Mere Work carried out. Lower wage level. Rare upgrades. Employers with criticisms.
Troisdorf 24
18.07.2009
The Reviewer rates his job as follows: Functioning collegiality. Problematic management style. Acceptable service. Lower wage level. Rare upgrades. Reasonable job provider.
Troisdorf 25
28.06.2009
The Reviewer rates his job as follows: Sufficient cohesion. Problematic management style. Mere Work carried out. Lower wage level. Rare upgrades. Employers with criticisms.
Troisdorf 26
28.06.2009
The Reviewer rates his job as follows: Lack of unity. Problematic management style. Mere Work carried out. Lower wage level. Rare upgrades. Employers with criticisms.
Troisdorf 27
29.02.2008
The Reviewer rates his job as follows: Pleasant cooperation. Good Management. Interesting tasks. Fair payments. Good future prospects. Recommendable workplace.
Troisdorf 28
06.10.2009
The Reviewer rates his job as follows: Recommendable workplace.
Troisdorf 29
04.11.2010
The Reviewer rates his job as follows: Recommendable workplace.
Troisdorf 30
10.01.2011
The Reviewer rates his job as follows: Pleasant cooperation. Good Management. Excellent activity. First class salary. Best career opportunities. Recommendable workplace.
Troisdorf 31
26.02.2011
The Reviewer rates his job as follows: Pleasant cooperation. Good Management. Interesting tasks. Fair payments. Best career opportunities. Recommendable workplace.
Troisdorf 32
07.09.2011
The Reviewer rates his job as follows: Lack of community spirit. Problematic management style. Mere Work carried out. Employers with criticisms.
Wien 33
12.10.2011
The Reviewer rates his job as follows: Excellent work atmosphere. Good Management. Excellent activity. Recommendable workplace.
Wiesbaden 34
16.08.2009
The Reviewer rates his job as follows: Sufficient cohesion. Problematic management style. No filling operation. Demotivating income. Rickety ladder of success. Not recommendable employer.
Wiesbaden 35
29.05.2015
The Reviewer rates his job as follows: Excellent employer.
